﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>19</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2007</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Comparison of remaining obturating material on canal walls using rotary and hand instrumentation techniques for endodontic re-treatment</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>13</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>20</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Jamileh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghoddusi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Pari</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghaziani</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shahrzad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nazari</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2007</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>25</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Comparison of remaining obturating material on canal walls using rotary and hand instrumentation techniques for endodontic re-treatment &lt;u&gt;Dr. J. Ghoddusi&lt;/u&gt;*- Dr. P. Ghaziani*- Dr. Sh. Nazari** *Associate Professor of Endodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.Â **Assistant Professor of Endodontics Dept., Faculty of Dentistry, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. Background and Aim: Inadequate removal of the original obturating material during non-surgical endodontic retreatment may lead to failure of root-canal therapy. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify and compare the percentage of root canal area occupied by remaining gutta-percha, employing rotary and hand instrumentation techniques with and without use of chloroform. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted single-rooted human teeth were prepared by a passive step-back technique in three different working lengths: optimum increased (over-instrumented) and reduced (under-instrumented). Obturation was performed by a combination of cold lateral and warm vertical compaction methods. The teeth were divided into 3 groups according to the methods used for gutta-percha removal: Group A, stainless steel K-type hand files plus chloroform Group B, rotary Ni-Ti files plus chloroform and Group C, rotary Ni-Ti files without chloroform. The roots were sectioned longitudinally and the percentage of root canal area occupied by root-filling material was calculated by a digital stereomicroscope in three levels: coronal, middle and apical. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Results: The coronal two-thirds contained larger amounts of filling material in all 3 groups, but the difference was not significant. A significantly smaller amount of gutta-percha/sealer was found in the middle and apical thirds in group C (P&lt;0.05). The relative percentage of canal area occupied by obturating material was not significantly different among the 3 working-lengths.Conclusion: The use of rotary files without solvent resulted in cleaner canals. However, completely clean root canal walls were not achieved with any of the studied instruments. Key words: Rotary instrumentation technique - Re-treatment - Obturating material - Chloroform </Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>