﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Iranian Dental Association</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Iranian Dental Association</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-8201</Issn>
      <Volume>23</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2011</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Tensile strength analysis of three different restoring techniques in canine primary teeth</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>217</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>224</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Eshghi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Raha</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kowsari- Esfahan</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Saeid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khatami</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nekouei</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hamid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mazaheri</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>maryam</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khoroushi</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2011</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2013</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>23</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;font size="2"&gt;Â Tensile strength analysis of three different restoring techniques in canine primary teeth &lt;/font&gt;Â &lt;i&gt;Â &lt;/i&gt;Â Dr. Eshghi A .,1 Dr. Kowsari - Esfahan R ., 2 Dr. Khatami S .,3 Dr. Nekouei M.,3 Dr. Mazaheri H., 4 Â &lt;u&gt; Dr. &lt;/u&gt;&lt;u&gt;Khoroushi &lt;/u&gt;&lt;u&gt;M.Â &lt;/u&gt;4 &lt;u /&gt;Â Â Â 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences . Isfahan , Iran . 2 Resident, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences . Isfahan , Iran . 3 Dentist. 4 Associate Professor , Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences . Isfahan , Iran . 5 Assistant Professor , Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences . Isfahan , Iran . Â Â &lt;i&gt; (Received 31 Jan, 2011 Accepted 29 June, 2011) &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i /&gt;Â &lt;i&gt;Â &lt;/i&gt;Â &lt;i&gt; Abstract &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i /&gt;Â &lt;i /&gt;Â &lt;i&gt; Background &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Aim &lt;/i&gt;: Extensive caries in the primary anterior teeth is one of the highly prevalent dental issues in primary dentition. On the other hand, special considerations for restoring these teeth are a challenge for the dental practitioner. The aim of this &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt; study was to compare the tensile bond strength of a new method of Reverse Metal Post Technique (RMPT) with two conventional methods. Â &lt;i&gt; Materials &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods &lt;/i&gt;: Eighty-four extracted primary canines were assigned to three equal groups. The crowns were cut-off 1 mm coronal to CEJ and the root canals were prepared for the next stage. The teeth were restored according to the groups they were assigned to Group 1 with composite posts Group 2 with alpha-shaped orthodontic wires and Group 3 with the RMPT. The specimens were then subjected to tensile force by a mechanical testing machine. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, tukey post hoc, Chi-square and student t test ( Î± =0.05). Â &lt;i&gt; Results &lt;/i&gt;: The mean tensile bond strength for groups 1, 2 and 3 were 6.26 Â± 2.40, 7.35 Â± 1.60 and 9.88 Â± 2.60MPa, respectively. A significant difference was observed between group 3 and the two other groups (p&lt;0.001). However, the difference between groups 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (p&gt;0.05). Â &lt;i&gt; Conclusion &lt;/i&gt;: The tensile bond strength was significantly higher in RMPT than the two conventional methods used for restoring severely destroyed primary anterior teeth. Â &lt;i&gt; Key words &lt;/i&gt;: Primary anterior teeth â€“ Composite restoration &lt;i&gt;â€“ &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i /&gt;Intra - canal post â€“ Tensile bond strength &lt;i /&gt;Â &lt;i&gt;Â &lt;/i&gt;Â &lt;i&gt; Corresponding Author: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dr. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Khoroushi &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;M .,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Â &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Associate Professor &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Department of &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Operative &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of Medical Sciences &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Isfahan &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, Iran &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;. &lt;/i&gt;Â &lt;i&gt; e.mail: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Khoroushi@dnt.mui.ac.ir &lt;/i&gt;</Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>