[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Policies::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Last site contents
:: Contact Us
:: Volume 26, Issue 4 (10-2014) ::
J Iran Dent Assoc 2014, 26(4): 221-225 Back to browse issues page
Radiographic Evaluation of Condylar Angle and Glenoid Fossa and Their Correlation with Malocclusion
Mehrdad Panjnoosh1 , Allahyar Gerami2 , Narjes Hoshyari * 3
1- Associate Professor, Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Ortodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Mazandaran, Iran , narjeshoshyari@rocketmail.com
Abstract:   (4777 Views)

Background and Aim: Malocclusion refers to misalignment or incorrect relation between the teeth and its frequency increases with age. Knowledge about normal occlusion can help determine the degree of deviation from the normal position. This study aimed to find a relationship between condylar angles and type of malocclusion.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 81 patients aged 15-25 years randomly selected from those presenting to the Orthodontics Department of School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences from 2001 to 2008. Subjects with craniofacial syndromes, congenital rheumatic diseases, thyroid problems and those taking hormonal medications were excluded from the study. Lateral cephalograms of pa-tients were obtained and type of malocclusion was determined using Wits analysis and measurement of ANB angle. The angle between the condylar head, condylar neck and articular eminence slope and the angle between the bisector of the afore-mentioned angle and the articular slope were measured on the cephalograms. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation test, paired t-test and two-way ANOVA.

Results: The correlation between the right and left angles was 0.459 in patients with class I malocclusion (p=0), 0.276 in patients with class II malocclusion (p=0.011) and 0.334 in patients with class III malocclusion (p=0.02). There were no significant associations be-tween these measurements and age, gender or type of malocclusion. The interaction effect of the two independent variables was not statistically significant either.

Conclusion: This study showed that there was no correlation between the type of maloc-clusion and the angle between the articular eminence slope and the horizontal line, the angle between the condylar head and condylar neck or the angle between the bisector of the aforementioned angle and the articular slope.

Keywords: Malocclusion, Temporomandibular joint, Morphology, Glenoid fossa
Full-Text [PDF 178 kb]   (2041 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
References
1. Bishara Samir. Textbook of orthodontics, 1st ed. USA: Saunders; 2001, 91-93.
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contempo-rary orthodontics, 4thed. USA: Mosby; 2007,156-157.
3. Saccucci M, D'Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F, Polimeni A, Tecco S. Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II, class III young adult subjects. Head Face Med. 2012 Dec 14; 8:34.
4. White stuart. Pharoah M. Oral radiology: principles & interpretation. 6th ed. USA: Mosby; 2009, 122-125.
5. Macfarlane TV, Kenealy P, Kingdon A, Mohlin BO, Piley JR, Richmond S, etal. Twenty - year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: Temporomandibular disorders. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun; 135(6):692 e1-8.
6. Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMj parame-ters in Class II and Class III patients. Stoma-tologija. 2009;11(1):32-6.
7. Shashikumar Hc. Morphologycal study of TMJ in orthodontically Treated Patients by using pretreatment&past treatment orthopartomogra-phy. The Ortho C J [Serial online] 2011 Dec; Availa-ble from: http://orthocj.com. Since 1996.
8. Egermark I, Thilander B. Craniomandibular disorders with special reference to orthodontic treatment: An evaluation from childhood to adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jan;101(1):28-34.
9. Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: A morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep; 128(3): 337-46.
10. Jackobson Alexander. Jackobson R. Radiographic cephalometry: From basics to 3-D imaging, 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub; 2006, 53.
11. Binqi R, Craparo A, Trovato F, Butti AC, Salvato A. Diagnosis of dental & mandibular asymmetries in children according to levandoski panoramic analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Dec;13(4):297-300.
12. Katsavrias EG. Morphology of temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Den-tofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr:129(4):470-8.
13. Duterloo HS. An atlas of dentition in childhood orthodontic diagnosis & panoramic radiology. 1sted. England: Wolfe; 1991, 67.
14. Peltola JS, Könönen M, Nyström M. Radiographic characteristics in mandibular condyles of orthodontic patients before treat-ment. Eur J Orthod. 1995 Feb;17(1):69-77.
15. Prabhat KC, Kumar Verma S, Maheshwari S, Ahmad I, Tariq M. Computed tomography evaluation of craniomandibular articulation in class II division 1 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion subjects in north indian population. ISRN Dent. 2012 Aug;16-21.
16. Saccucci M, PolImeni A, Festa F, Tecco S. Do skeletal cephalometrics correlate with condylar volume, surface & shape? a 3D analysis. Head Face Med. 2012 May15; 8:15.
17. Wanman A, Agerberg G. Mandibular dysfunction in adolescents-I Prevalence of symptoms. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Feb; 44(1): 47-54.
18. Larheim TA, Johannessen S, Tveito L. Abnormalities of temporomandibular joint in adult with rheumatic disease. A comparison of panoramic, transcranial and transpharyngeal radiography with tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1988; 17(2):109-13.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Panjnoosh M, Gerami A, Hoshyari N. Radiographic Evaluation of Condylar Angle and Glenoid Fossa and Their Correlation with Malocclusion. J Iran Dent Assoc 2014; 26 (4) :221-225
URL: http://jida.ir/article-1-1715-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 4 (10-2014) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Iranian Dental Association

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645